• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Log in

  • About
    • The GradFund Team
    • Success Stories
  • Advice
    • Blog
    • Planning When to Apply
    • Proposal Writing Advice
  • Fellowships and Grants
    • Search for Fellowships and Grants
    • SGS Managed Awards
    • SGS Competitive Awards
  • Resources
    • GradFund Self-Paced Guide to Grants and Fellowships
    • Research Development Support
    • Funding Directories
  • Questions
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Contact Us
  • Meet With Us

Understanding an External Award Program

Posted on May 23, 2013 by Kelsey Bitting

Taking the time to fully understand an award program is a critical part of the application preparation process that novice proposal writers sometimes overlook. GradFund suggests carefully following the multi-step process below before even beginning to draft your application materials. These steps will allow you to tailor your application to the guidelines, funder’s goals, and review audience, setting it ahead in the review process from the start.

First, take the time to get to know the funding institution offering the award: Is it a government agency, a professional society, a non-profit, and how might this designation impact the funder’s guidelines and intentions? What goals does the institution as a whole intend to accomplish, and how might the variety of different awards and programs offered come together to help them meet these goals? What funding streams support the institution (taxpayer funds, donations, private foundations, membership funds), and how might this impact the ways in which it allocates money to award programs or individual applicants?

Next, carefully read all the documents and information related to the specific award program. How does the funder intend to support their mission through this award, and how will your application enable them to do so? What are the eligibility guidelines, and do you meet these criteria? Who will read the proposal (specialists in your field, specialists in multiple fields, non-specialists), and what is the review process (one tier of review, or multiple tiers of review by different panels)? What narrative elements must you present in the proposal, what criteria do you need to meet, and what other specifications are necessary to leave the reviewers with a positive impression of your application? Highlight or take notes on elements of the guidelines you will want to keep in front of you as you draft your proposal.

Then, go the extra distance to set yourself up for success: If the website includes a list of recent awards made through the program, investigate trends in topical emphases, disciplinary backgrounds, methodologies, and other characteristics. Finally, use all the information you have gleaned from the process above as a starting point for a deeper conversation with the program officer about how your research topic and professional goals will fit with the goals of the award program.

Once you have established a deeper understanding of your funder and award, try to view your application through the lens of that program’s reviewers and program officer. Rutgers graduate students are always welcome to schedule an individual meeting for strategic planning or application review to for help understanding an award or appealing to the funder’s goals.

Filed Under: Proposal Writing Advice, Understanding Award Types

Stay in Touch!

Our newsletter will keep you informed about new funding opportunities and upcoming deadlines, as well as information about GradFund services and other resources that will help you search for and apply to funding opportunities.

* indicates required





Reader Interactions

Trackbacks

  1. How to Describe Teaching in a Fellowship Application | GradFund Conversations says:
    May 23, 2013 at 2:38 pm

    […] important element to consider is your review audience. If you are applying for a Ford Foundation Fellowship, for example, you are asked to explain in […]

  2. How to Describe Teaching in a Fellowship Application | GradFund Conversations says:
    May 23, 2013 at 2:38 pm

    […] important element to consider is your review audience. If you are applying for a Ford Foundation Fellowship, for example, you are asked to explain in […]

  3. Understanding Postdocs with a Teaching or Research Emphasis | GradFund Conversations says:
    May 23, 2013 at 2:39 pm

    […] seems to have the right balance for you, contact the program officer or program administrator to learn more about the review process, criteria, and characteristics of a successful […]

  4. Understanding Postdocs with a Teaching or Research Emphasis | GradFund Conversations says:
    May 23, 2013 at 2:39 pm

    […] seems to have the right balance for you, contact the program officer or program administrator to learn more about the review process, criteria, and characteristics of a successful […]

  5. Completion Fellowships: Understanding your Options | GradFund Conversations says:
    May 23, 2013 at 2:42 pm

    […] ← How to Describe Teaching in a Fellowship Application Understanding an External Award Program → […]

  6. Completion Fellowships: Understanding your Options | GradFund Conversations says:
    May 23, 2013 at 2:42 pm

    […] ← How to Describe Teaching in a Fellowship Application Understanding an External Award Program → […]

  7. Ambassador, Scholar, Fellow | GradFund Conversations says:
    May 23, 2013 at 2:43 pm

    […] fellowships are often focused on the financial benefits of the award, and may overlook the funders’ larger purpose: To nurture a community of scholars devoted to advancing the program’s research goals. To develop […]

  8. Ambassador, Scholar, Fellow | GradFund Conversations says:
    May 23, 2013 at 2:43 pm

    […] fellowships are often focused on the financial benefits of the award, and may overlook the funders’ larger purpose: To nurture a community of scholars devoted to advancing the program’s research goals. To develop […]

  9. Bringing Your Proposal Full-Circle: The Conclusion | GradFund Conversations says:
    May 23, 2013 at 2:57 pm

    […] and effective ways to wrap up a proposal is to explain your contribution to the discipline and goals of the funding organization. Every proposal should make a specific argument about the contributions of the research. This […]

  10. Bringing Your Proposal Full-Circle: The Conclusion | GradFund Conversations says:
    May 23, 2013 at 2:57 pm

    […] and effective ways to wrap up a proposal is to explain your contribution to the discipline and goals of the funding organization. Every proposal should make a specific argument about the contributions of the research. This […]

  11. The Final Edit | GradFund Conversations says:
    May 23, 2013 at 3:07 pm

    […] carefully re-read the award program solicitation and any information on the funder’s website. Have you prepared all of the necessary materials […]

  12. The Final Edit | GradFund Conversations says:
    May 23, 2013 at 3:07 pm

    […] carefully re-read the award program solicitation and any information on the funder’s website. Have you prepared all of the necessary materials […]

  13. Arguing for the Importance of Your Research: The Literature Review | GradFund Conversations says:
    May 23, 2013 at 3:19 pm

    […] citations to appeal to the funding program’s goals and the reviewers’ expertise. For example, if you are applying for an NSF Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grant in […]

  14. Arguing for the Importance of Your Research: The Literature Review | GradFund Conversations says:
    May 23, 2013 at 3:19 pm

    […] citations to appeal to the funding program’s goals and the reviewers’ expertise. For example, if you are applying for an NSF Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grant in […]

  15. Bird’s Eye View – A Timeline for Applying for Funding | GradFund Conversations says:
    May 27, 2013 at 7:07 am

    […] ← Understanding an External Award Program […]

  16. Bird’s Eye View – A Timeline for Applying for Funding | GradFund Conversations says:
    May 27, 2013 at 7:07 am

    […] ← Understanding an External Award Program […]

  17. Preparing to Write: Some Tips to Get You Started on that Fellowship or Grant Application | GradFund Conversations says:
    June 7, 2013 at 7:17 am

    […] familiarize yourself with the contours of this genre. Studying these materials will also establish funders’ expectations that will serve as points of reference throughout the proposal development and writing […]

  18. Preparing to Write: Some Tips to Get You Started on that Fellowship or Grant Application | GradFund Conversations says:
    June 7, 2013 at 7:17 am

    […] familiarize yourself with the contours of this genre. Studying these materials will also establish funders’ expectations that will serve as points of reference throughout the proposal development and writing […]

  19. Giving and Working with Peer Feedback | GradFund Conversations says:
    June 10, 2013 at 7:05 am

    […] While these are suggestions for the process of providing feedback, there are also principles that will enable you to optimize the critical comments you receive on your work. First, make sure that you are clear on what the feedback is saying. If there is something you don’t understand clearly, consider reaching out to your peer reviewer for further clarification. Second, aim not to take the constructive criticism personally and not to be discouraged when weaknesses in your application essays are revealed. Because the mentoring program falls well before the majority of application deadlines, you will have plenty of time to improve your work and submit a polished product to your funder. […]

  20. Giving and Working with Peer Feedback | GradFund Conversations says:
    June 10, 2013 at 7:05 am

    […] While these are suggestions for the process of providing feedback, there are also principles that will enable you to optimize the critical comments you receive on your work. First, make sure that you are clear on what the feedback is saying. If there is something you don’t understand clearly, consider reaching out to your peer reviewer for further clarification. Second, aim not to take the constructive criticism personally and not to be discouraged when weaknesses in your application essays are revealed. Because the mentoring program falls well before the majority of application deadlines, you will have plenty of time to improve your work and submit a polished product to your funder. […]

  21. Personal Statements: Crafting Your Intellectual Biography | GradFund Conversations says:
    June 17, 2013 at 7:11 am

    […] the right details in a personal statement is a delicate balancing act that depends heavily on the type of funder and the goals the funder intends to accomplish. In this post, we will discuss personal statements for three […]

  22. Personal Statements: Crafting Your Intellectual Biography | GradFund Conversations says:
    June 17, 2013 at 7:11 am

    […] the right details in a personal statement is a delicate balancing act that depends heavily on the type of funder and the goals the funder intends to accomplish. In this post, we will discuss personal statements for three […]

  23. What Will You Do When? The Art of Designing a Persuasive Timeline | GradFund Conversations says:
    July 18, 2013 at 4:04 pm

    […] the recipients to engage in specific activities during the time of funding. Carefully read the program requirements and check with a program officer if necessary, to make sure you’re only included […]

  24. What Will You Do When? The Art of Designing a Persuasive Timeline | GradFund Conversations says:
    July 18, 2013 at 4:04 pm

    […] the recipients to engage in specific activities during the time of funding. Carefully read the program requirements and check with a program officer if necessary, to make sure you’re only included […]

  25. The Art of the Introduction | GradFund Conversations says:
    July 18, 2013 at 4:32 pm

    […] (just one paragraph). Second, describe how your research will advance your field of study and the goals of the funding organization and award program (one or two paragraphs). If your length is somewhere in between two and ten […]

  26. The Art of the Introduction | GradFund Conversations says:
    July 18, 2013 at 4:32 pm

    […] (just one paragraph). Second, describe how your research will advance your field of study and the goals of the funding organization and award program (one or two paragraphs). If your length is somewhere in between two and ten […]

  27. Program Officers: Understanding Awards from an Insider’s Perspective | GradFund Conversations says:
    July 18, 2013 at 4:35 pm

    […] to application-specific details and components. After reviewing the website and solicitation for a particular award, program officers (program managers, program administrators, or perhaps award administrators, […]

  28. Program Officers: Understanding Awards from an Insider’s Perspective | GradFund Conversations says:
    July 18, 2013 at 4:35 pm

    […] to application-specific details and components. After reviewing the website and solicitation for a particular award, program officers (program managers, program administrators, or perhaps award administrators, […]

  29. Gaining a Fresh Perspective on an Old Document | GradFund Conversations says:
    August 19, 2013 at 7:31 am

    […] the funder guidelines – If your document seems stale, go back to the funder guidelines and pay close attention to how they describe their mission. This might trigger some ideas for how […]

  30. Gaining a Fresh Perspective on an Old Document | GradFund Conversations says:
    August 19, 2013 at 7:31 am

    […] the funder guidelines – If your document seems stale, go back to the funder guidelines and pay close attention to how they describe their mission. This might trigger some ideas for how […]

  31. Keys to the Castle? Strategic Use of Sample Proposals | GradFund Conversations says:
    September 9, 2013 at 7:30 am

    […] to the next, and may eliminate one essay or short answer prompt in favor of a new one. Even the goals of the award program can shift significantly over the life of a program due to changes in funding streams or funder […]

  32. Keys to the Castle? Strategic Use of Sample Proposals | GradFund Conversations says:
    September 9, 2013 at 7:30 am

    […] to the next, and may eliminate one essay or short answer prompt in favor of a new one. Even the goals of the award program can shift significantly over the life of a program due to changes in funding streams or funder […]

  33. Proposal Writing 101 | GradFund Conversations says:
    September 11, 2013 at 7:01 am

    […] you should always follow the guidelines of the award program for which you will apply. If you are unclear on any of the details, contact the program officer for […]

  34. Proposal Writing 101 | GradFund Conversations says:
    September 11, 2013 at 7:01 am

    […] you should always follow the guidelines of the award program for which you will apply. If you are unclear on any of the details, contact the program officer for […]

  35. In-Residence Fellowships for Research and Writing | GradFund Conversations says:
    September 23, 2013 at 7:05 am

    […] the reviewers that you and your scholarship are especially relevant to the research theme or other goals of the program. Second, explain the specific ways in which being a part of this community will benefit the […]

  36. In-Residence Fellowships for Research and Writing | GradFund Conversations says:
    September 23, 2013 at 7:05 am

    […] the reviewers that you and your scholarship are especially relevant to the research theme or other goals of the program. Second, explain the specific ways in which being a part of this community will benefit the […]

  37. Writing an Annotated Bibliography for Funding Proposals | GradFund Conversations says:
    October 2, 2013 at 7:04 am

    […] included in the proposal, although some applications allow a more expansive list. Consult the application guidelines and program officer if this is […]

  38. Writing an Annotated Bibliography for Funding Proposals | GradFund Conversations says:
    October 2, 2013 at 7:04 am

    […] included in the proposal, although some applications allow a more expansive list. Consult the application guidelines and program officer if this is […]

  39. Understanding the Review Process | GradFund Conversations says:
    October 14, 2013 at 7:19 am

    […] debates or concerns in evolutionary biology). If the review criteria are not listed, and the award program does not explicitly state its purpose, you will need to go deeper to understand your funder as a […]

  40. Understanding the Review Process | GradFund Conversations says:
    October 14, 2013 at 7:19 am

    […] debates or concerns in evolutionary biology). If the review criteria are not listed, and the award program does not explicitly state its purpose, you will need to go deeper to understand your funder as a […]

  41. Responding to Reviewer Comments | GradFund Conversations says:
    May 19, 2014 at 7:20 am

    […] Do contact the program officer if you have any questions about the feedback given by the reviewers. While he or she may not know for sure what the reviewer meant by a specific comment, they may be able to provide clarification from the funder’s perspective. […]

  42. Responding to Reviewer Comments | GradFund Conversations says:
    May 19, 2014 at 7:20 am

    […] Do contact the program officer if you have any questions about the feedback given by the reviewers. While he or she may not know for sure what the reviewer meant by a specific comment, they may be able to provide clarification from the funder’s perspective. […]

Search Awards

Make an Appointment →

Get personalized help finding funding and writing applications

Founded in 2000, GradFund’s mission is to assist Rutgers graduate students in securing merit-based research grants and fellowships to support their graduate study and research. Read about our history and approach to working with graduate students. Learn more →

Copyright © 2025 Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, an equal opportunity, affirmative action institution. All rights reserved. Log in